Center On Executive Compensation
Analysis

Compensation Committee Checklist for Assessing...

Published on: May 18, 2022

Authors: Dr. Charles G. Tharp

Topics: Compensation Committee and Board, Corporate Governance, Executive Pay Legislation and Regulation


As Board Compensation Committees consider and finalize executive compensation arrangements, they will seek to confirm that the company’s incentive programs are appropriately structured for the company and discourage executives from taking “excessive risk.”  Many Committees will also voluntarily disclose how their compensation programs address the subject of risk, in light of the 2009 SEC regulations which require analysis of risk for compensation programs aimed at employees below the executive level.  The Center On Executive Compensation has created the following checklist to help guide Compensation Committees on these issues.  The questions that form the basis of the checklist are provided below and in greater detail on the subsequent pages.

 Read the full document here

1.   Do the performance criteria and corresponding objectives represent a balance of performance and the quality and sustainability of such performance?

2.   Is the mix of compensation overly weighted toward annual incentive awards or is there a balance of annual and long-term incentive opportunities?

3.   When compared to a carefully chosen peer group, is the relationship between performance and incentive plan payouts within the range of competitive practices?

4.   Is there a relationship between performance criteria and payouts under the annual incentive award consistent with targeted performance under the long-term
 incentive awards?

5.   Are the long-term incentive performance measures or equity devices overly leveraged and thereby potentially encourage excessively risky behavior?

6.   Is there a requirement that a meaningful portion of the shares received from incentive award payouts be retained by the participants?

7.   Has the Board of Directors adopted a recoupment policy which provides for the clawback of incentive payouts that are based on performance results that are subsequently revised or restated and would have produced lower payouts from incentive plans?

8.   Does the Compensation Committee discuss the concept of risk when establishing incentive performance criteria and approving incentive payouts?  Are such discussions recorded in the minutes of the Committee meeting?  Does the Compensation Discussion and Analysis articulate how the company’s incentive plans mitigate risk?

9. If the company includes non-financial metrics, such as DE&I, safety, and climate, as incentive objectives, does the Compensation Committee ensure that the targeted levels of performance on such metrics do not motivate participants to engage in unintended actions to achieve them?

Dr. Charles G. Tharp

Senior Advisor, Research and Practice, Center On Executive Compensation

Detailed Bio

Contact Dr. Charles G. Tharp LinkedIn

MORE PUBLICATIONS

Center Comments to SEC on Proxy Rules for Proxy Voting Advice
Executive Pay Legislation and Regulation

Center Comments to SEC on Proxy Rules for Proxy Voting Advice

December 23, 2021 | Publication
Center Comments to SEC: 2021 Re-Proposal Dodd-Frank Clawback Rule
Executive Pay Legislation and Regulation

Center Comments to SEC: 2021 Re-Proposal Dodd-Frank Clawback Rule

November 17, 2021 | Publication
Checklist for Evaluation of the Compensation Committee’s Compensation Consultant
Compensation Committee and Board

Checklist for Evaluation of the Compensation Committee’s Compensation Consultant

March 15, 2019 | Publication

Continue reading this content with the Center On Executive Compensation Membership package