EU: The right to disconnect

EU debates "right to disconnect" directive amid complex considerations. UK abandons similar plans, while Australia's opposition pushes for full-time office return in public sector.

Key points: European trade unions continue to press for a "right to disconnect" directive. Commission considering complex issues like urgency situations and time zone differences. Meanwhile the U.K. is abandoning similar plans; while in Australia the conservative opposition proposing full-time office return for public sector

Why this matters: As we understand it, the Commission is taking its time drafting the proposals as it is not simply a matter of giving employees a right to switch off after finishing time. What happens in situations of urgency, and when an unexpected problem presents itself? What about working across time zones? Who would be covered by such a Directive and who would be excluded? These matters are never as simple as those calling for a law contend. 

The background: Negotiations between the ETUC and BusinessEurope on an agreement on remote working and the right to disconnect broke down in late 2023 as a result of opposition to the proposed deal from some national employer organisations. 

The European Commission opened a consultation with the social partners as required in considering new legislation. The first-round consultation concluded in 2024, and the Commission is considering the results. It is now preparing detailed proposals on which it will consult the social partners for a second time. The ETUC is unhappy with the delay in starting the second-round consultations. 

What might happen next: The Commission will likely present detailed proposals for a second round of consultations with social partners.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:

See this article by the deputy general secretary of the ETUC on the issue.

Financial Times reports on Australian opposition moves (paywall)