- Any costs associated with improving health, including wellness programs, on-site clinics, and employee assistance programs;
- Mandated preventive care services, since health care benefits should not be both required and considered excessive at the same time;
- Employee contributions to health savings accounts, flexible spending accounts, and health reimbursement accounts; and
- Any costs associated with efforts aimed at innovation in health care delivery that are designed to reduce excessive health care spending and improve health outcomes such as direct contracting with providers, utilizing accountable care organizations, patient-centered medical homes, Centers of Excellence, and bundled and capitation payment initiatives.
Published on:
Authors: D. Mark Wilson
Topics:
This week, the Association filed comments urging the Internal Revenue Service to significantly narrow the kinds of health benefits subject to the so-called "Cadillac" tax, as well as give employers maximum flexibility in determining the cost of coverage, and in making demographic adjustments to excise tax thresholds. HR Policy's comments noted that member companies offer employees a host of innovative health benefits that are lowering rather than driving unnecessary utilization and that the ACA's excise tax may undermine the ability of employers to continue such innovation. To avoid the inevitability of "Chevrolet" benefit plans eventually being taxed as "Cadillacs," and to remove the potential negative impact that the tax will have on employer-sponsored health benefits, the Association strongly urged the IRS to exclude from the excise tax:
MORE NEWS STORIES
House Considers 15 Telehealth Bills Aimed at Increasing Access
April 12, 2024 | News
White House Spotlight on Pharmacy Benefit Managers
March 08, 2024 | News
HR Policy Association Reiterates Need for Health Care Price Transparency
February 01, 2024 | News