The site navigation utilizes arrow, enter, escape, and space bar key commands. Left and right arrows move across top level links and expand / close menus in sub levels. Up and Down arrows will open main level menus and toggle through sub tier links. Enter and space open menus and escape closes them as well. Tab will move on to the next part of the site rather than go through menu items.
In a blow to the Obama NLRB's expansive interpretation of "protected concerted activity,” the Fifth Circuit has overturned the NLRB's 2012 decision in D.R. Horton that the company violated the National Labor Relations Act by requiring its employees to sign an arbitration agreement that, among other things, prohibited an employee from pursuing class action claims. The court ruled that the Board had not given proper weight to the Federal Arbitration Act, which "establishes 'a liberal federal policy favoring arbitration agreement' . . . [with the purpose of ensuring] 'the enforcement of arbitration agreements according to their terms.'" Though this clearly is one of the major components of the Board's expansion of "protected concerted activity" (PCA), its unique interplay with the Federal Arbitration Act probably limits its significance regarding other PCA cases involving social media, workplace investigations, etc. Nevertheless, it does serve as a reminder to the Board that the National Labor Relations Act does not operate unilaterally to the detriment of other laws and policies. HR Policy filed an amicus brief in support of D.R. Horton.
Daniel V. Yager
Senior Advisor, Workplace Policy, HR Policy Association